This website is intended for healthcare professionals only

Trending Topic

4 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Personalized and predictive dermatology recognizes that each patient is unique and aims to comprehensively address all aspects of an individual’s skin health. This approach tailors skin care treatments based on a combination of factors, including genetic and epigenetic profiles, skin type, microbiome composition and the exposome (an individual’s lifetime exposures).1 Scientists are exploring how ecological […]

Pregnancy-associated unilateral nevoid telangiectasia: A case report

Douglas J Vadner, Caddie Nguyen, Brigid O'Kane, Sidney Smith
5 mins
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Oct 23rd 2026 touchREVIEWS in Dermatology. 2026;1(1):1–3:Online ahead of journal publication
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Unilateral nevoid telangiectasia (UNT) is a vascular cutaneous condition characterized by unilateral telangiectatic macules in dermatomal, segmental or mosaic distributions. The acquired form is more commonly reported in women and is associated with hyperestrogenic states, including pregnancy. Although rare, pregnancy-associated cases may present with an abrupt onset and striking unilateral involvement that can prompt concern for systemic disease. A 32-year-old woman at 32 weeks’ gestation presented with a 2-month history of asymptomatic, blanchable vascular macules involving the left chest, abdomen and back. Examination revealed multiple 1–3 mm telangiectatic macules arranged in a unilateral segmental distribution with marked midline predominance. Laboratory evaluation, including complete blood count and liver function tests, was unremarkable. This case highlights pregnancy-associated UNT with a pronounced unilateral segmental distribution and is consistent with a localized hormonally responsive vascular process. Recognition of this benign condition allows reassurance, avoidance of unnecessary diagnostic workup and appropriate counseling regarding the expected postpartum course.

Keywords
2

Article

Unilateral nevoid telangiectasia (UNT), also known as unilateral dermatomal superficial telangiectasia, is a cutaneous condition characterized by the presence of telangiectasia in unilateral, segmental or mosaic distributions.1 UNT may be congenital or acquired. Congenital UNT is uncommon, more often reported in males, and is thought to reflect developmental vascular mosaicism. Acquired UNT is more commonly reported in women and has been associated with hyperestrogenic and systemic conditions.2

Although not fully understood, the development of this condition is often linked to states of hyperestrogenism. It is reported in pregnancy, oral contraceptive pill use, chronic alcoholism, hepatitis B and C infection, liver cirrhosis, hyperthyroidism and carcinoid syndrome. UNT has also been reported in a young male patient following chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s disease in remission, as well as in otherwise healthy adult and pediatric patients.3,4

The leading hypothesis is that hyperestrogenic states may unmask localized vascular sensitivity in predisposed cutaneous mosaic regions, potentially due to chromosomal mosaicism. Other proposed mechanisms include neural alterations, hemodynamic changes, abnormalities in perivascular tissue and angiogenic factors.2

Case report

A 32-year-old woman presented to dermatology with a 2-month history of asymptomatic blanchable telangiectatic lesions involving the left side of the trunk. She reported an earlier generalized pruritic eruption during early pregnancy characterized by transient erythematous raised patches occurring in areas of friction or contact with clothing and bedding, which resolved after changes to detergents and skincare products. She denied associated viral symptoms or systemic illness. She denied any history of liver disease, hepatitis, thyroid disease or other hormonal disorders. The subsequent telangiectatic eruption developed later in the second trimester, was asymptomatic and was clinically distinct from the earlier pruritic eruption. She was 32 weeks’ gestation with no reported pregnancy complications. She denied any prior similar eruptions before this pregnancy. Physical examination revealed multiple blanchable 1–3 mm telangiectatic macules arranged in a unilateral segmental pattern with marked midline predominance, with minimal extension across the linea nigra on the lower abdomen. Several lesions demonstrated subtle peripheral anemic halos and were distributed over the left trunk, involving the abdomen, chest and upper back (Figure 1). Laboratory evaluation revealed no abnormalities in complete blood count, serum chemistry panel or liver function tests. Additional systemic testing, including hepatitis serologies and thyroid function testing, was not pursued because the patient lacked clinical symptoms or laboratory abnormalities suggestive of hepatic disease, thyroid disease or systemic illness. The patient was counseled regarding the benign nature of the condition and the possibility of spontaneous postpartum resolution. On follow-up after delivery, the eruption demonstrated near-complete spontaneous resolution within several days postpartum and subsequently remained stable at the baseline appearance shown in patient-provided follow-up photographs, without reported recurrence (Figure 2).

Figure 1: Clinical presentation of pregnancy-associated unilateral nevoid telangiectasia

Figure 1: Clinical presentation of pregnancy-associated unilateral nevoid telangiectasia

(A) Left oblique abdominal view demonstrating unilateral segmental telangiectatic macules. (B) Frontal abdominal view showing marked midline predominance with minimal extension across the linea nigra. (C) Close-up view of abdominal lesions demonstrating blanchable telangiectatic macules with subtle peripheral anemic halos. (D) Posterior–lateral view demonstrating extension of the eruption over the left upper back

Figure 2: Postpartum follow-up photographs

Figure 2: Postpartum follow-up photographs

Patient-provided postpartum follow-up photographs obtained approximately 8 months after delivery, demonstrating marked interval improvement with residual faint telangiectatic change following spontaneous postpartum regression of pregnancy-associated unilateral nevoid telangiectasia. Left upper arm was affected during the active phase but not captured in the original clinical photographs; follow-up photographs provided by the patient demonstrate interval improvement at this additional involved site

The patient reported that the eruption had maintained a similar baseline appearance since near-complete resolution within several days postpartum. (A) Abdominal follow-up view. (B) Left upper arm follow-up view. (C) Left upper back follow-up view

Skin biopsy was considered but deferred because the lesions were asymptomatic and clinically characteristic, and the patient was in the third trimester of pregnancy, where the anticipated diagnostic yield was felt to be low relative to procedural burden.

Discussion

Pregnancy-associated UNT is an infrequently reported manifestation that demonstrates the classic clinical features of UNT in patients within a hyperestrogenic state. In the acquired form, lesions typically present as asymptomatic, blanchable telangiectatic macules in a unilateral segmental or dermatomal distribution. This case is notable for its sharply localized unilateral involvement and marked midline predominance, supporting the hypothesis of localized vascular sensitivity. This case adds to the limited literature describing pregnancy-associated acquired UNT and highlights the characteristic postpartum regression seen in hormonally associated disease.1

The differential diagnosis included other vascular and telangiectatic eruptions that may present during pregnancy or in a segmental distribution. UNT remains an overlooked diagnosis that may be mistaken for other telangiectatic dermatoses.3 Spider angiomas were considered but were less favored because the lesions lacked a central arteriole with radiating vessels and were distributed in a unilateral segmental pattern rather than diffusely.5 Eruptive pseudoangiomatosis was considered, given the presence of anemic halos, as this entity classically presents with blanchable angioma-like papules surrounded by pale halos, often in association with viral triggers; however, the absence of viral symptoms, unilateral segmental distribution, persistence during pregnancy and spontaneous postpartum resolution favored UNT.6 Telangiectasia macularis eruptiva perstans was considered but was less likely given the absence of characteristic brown macules, urtication, flushing or other symptoms suggestive of mast cell disease.7 Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy was also considered; however, this entity typically presents as progressive generalized telangiectasias rather than an abrupt unilateral eruption.8 Given the pregnancy-associated onset, blanchable telangiectatic macules, segmental distribution, and reassuring laboratory evaluation, acquired UNT was favored.

Although histopathologic confirmation was not obtained in this case, reported histopathologic findings in UNT are generally nonspecific and include dilated superficial dermal capillaries without significant endothelial proliferation, vasculitis or inflammatory infiltrate. In some reported cases, increased estrogen and progesterone receptor expression within affected vessels has been proposed, supporting a hormonally mediated mechanism in susceptible skin.1,2 Histopathologic evaluation may be particularly useful when the diagnosis is uncertain or when distinguishing UNT from mimickers such as cutaneous mastocytosis, cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy or other vascular proliferations.

Known associations between UNT and hyperestrogenism include pregnancy, oral contraceptive pill use and cirrhosis of the liver.1 Additionally, UNT has been reported in other states of estrogen excess or vascular change, namely hyperthyroidism, carcinoid syndrome, ovarian malignancy and chemotherapy, highlighting the multifactorial nature of the condition.3,9,10 Several pregnancy-associated UNT cases have been reported to improve or resolve postpartum, although persistence beyond delivery has also been described.11 In this case, marked spontaneous postpartum regression occurred within several days after delivery, with the patient subsequently reporting a stable baseline appearance without recurrence. Given the temporal association with pregnancy, unilateral segmental distribution, absence of systemic disease and marked spontaneous postpartum resolution, pregnancy-associated acquired UNT was strongly favored clinically. Recognition of this entity allows appropriate reassurance, while acknowledging the possibility of recurrence in future hormonal states.

As a single case report, limitations include the absence of histopathologic confirmation and the inability to definitively exclude all vascular mimickers without tissue diagnosis. Additionally, causality between pregnancy-related hormonal changes and lesion development cannot be definitively established. Despite these limitations, the clinical presentation, unilateral segmental distribution, spontaneous postpartum resolution and reassuring laboratory evaluation were considered most consistent with pregnancy-associated UNT.

Conclusion

Pregnancy-associated UNT is an uncommon but recognizable benign vascular eruption that may present in a unilateral segmental distribution during hyperestrogenic states. Recognition of this entity and its clinical mimickers can help avoid unnecessary systemic workup, while allowing appropriate reassurance and follow-up counseling regarding the potential for postpartum improvement.

3

References

List View
Grid View
1
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

Claudia M, Astrid H, Cozzani E, et al. Unilateral nevoid telangiectasia: A rare and underdiagnosed skin disease. Eur J Dermatol. 2020;30:601–2. DOI: 10.1684/ejd.2020.3867.

2
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

Guedes R, Leite L. Unilateral nevoid telangiectasia: A rare disease? Indian J Dermatol. 2012;57:138–40. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.94288.

3
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

Sukanya G, Sane RR, Ravi VN, Nehete SS. Unilateral nevoid telangiectasia: An overlooked entity. Indian J Dermatol. 2022;67:423–4. DOI: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_828_21.

4
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

Kawakami T, Kimura S, Soma Y. Unilateral nevoid telangiectasia on the lower extremity of a pediatric patient. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62:528–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.02.030.

5
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

Samant H, Kothadia JP. Spider Angioma. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2025.

6
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

Gaudiello F, Spennato S, Cillo F, et al. Eruptive pseudoangiomatosis and parvovirus: Exclusive findings in clinical manifestation from a report of four cases. Int J Dermatol Venereol. 2024;7:236–8. DOI: 10.1097/JD9.0000000000000384.

7
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

Siddique L, Ahrns H, Seiverling E. Ringed telangiectasias: An unusual presentation of telangiectasia macularis eruptiva perstans. BMJ Case Rep. 2017;2017:bcr–2017. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2017-221784.

8
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

Burdick LM, Lohser S, Somach SC, Billings SD. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy: A rare cutaneous microangiopathy: Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy. J Cutan Pathol. 2012;39:741–6.

9
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

Pranteda G, Gueli N, Innocenzi D, et al. Ovarian cancer and unilateral naevoid telangiectasia: A rare association. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 1997;16:71–3.

10
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

Kavak A, Kutluay L. Unilateral nevoid telangiectasia and hyperthyroidism: A new association or coincidence? J Dermatol. 2004;31:411–4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2004.tb00694.x.

11
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

Herzum A, Micalizzi C, Parodi A. Unilateral nevoid telangiectasia after pregnancy. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021;11:e2021119. DOI: 10.5826/dpc.1104a119.

4

Article Information

Disclosure

Douglas Jaxon Vadner, Caddie Nguyen, Brigid O’Kane and Sidney Smith have no financial or non-financial relationships or activities to declare in relation to this article.

Compliance With Ethics

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Written informed consent for publication of clinical details and images was obtained from the patient.

Review Process

Double-blind peer review.

Authorship

All named authors meet the criteria of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors for authorship for this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole and have given final approval for the version to be published.

Correspondence

Douglas J Vadner, Chicago Medical School at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, 3333 Green Bay Rd, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA; [email protected]

Support

No funding was received in the publication of this article.

Access

This article is freely accessible at touchDERMATOLOGY.com. © Touch Medical Media 2026.

Acknowledgements

No artificial intelligence (AI) or large language model (LLM) tools were used in the development of this article.

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the writing of this article.

Received

2026-03-02

5

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup